![]() ![]() ![]() I can relate to that atmosphere of fear today, and in art it's the feelings that matter - not the facts. You could say they pulled from several distinct events and put them together to make one fun to watch movie. But look at the headlines from the russia from today - very little has changed and some of the speeches apply just as well today. Yes, of course they invented the corrupt KBG agent, the most obvious displays of power and the final car chase. Usually at least the principal characters would be cast from English-speakers, but not here. Every russian, down to minor parts, is also portrayed by a native actor - it's refreshing to hear 100% accurate speech in such a big production. It's obviously a much different story, genre and tone than HBO's Chernobyl, but I had the same reaction while watching it: I've been in those buildings, I've heard that russian "language of officialdom", I recognize those clothes. Not only does it have a likeable underdog protagonist, a hate sink villain(s) and an everyman caught in-between, it's an incredibly faithful portrayal of the late-Soviet era. Mainly, his impact on the publishing industry was all about aggressively growing and consolidating scientific journals, which in turn shaped the whole academic publishing scene, including things like peer review.Īnd his dickhead son wasn't the one to diddle kids apparently. This could've led to the quality of the peer review process going downhill in some cases.īut yeah, the article doesn't straight-up say how Maxwell affected the peer review process. Like, after Elsevier got Pergamon, they started cutting corners on stuff like having good editorial boards and marketing, just to save some cash. Now, with big publishers like Elsevier having a ton of control over scientific publishing, their focus on making bank might've messed with how journals and the peer review process were managed for a very long tiume. This guy saw major $$$ in scientific journals, so he went all-in with the whole growth and consolidation thing, which eventually led to Elsevier buying Pergamon Press. Oh man, this article doesn't really dive deep into Maxwell's direct impact on the peer review process, but it does show how his shady af business tactics indirectly influenced it. Doesn't even break the surface on this mf. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |